As happens so often, yesterday, at the tail end of a very busy day that didn’t end until 9 pm, I found out about the United Auto Workers Strike at General Motors. It’s a nationwide strike, which affects the GM plant in Fredericksburg. I wanted to do a quick post about it with the hope of filling in more details later. And I wanted the announcement to go out to the wider progressive community in Virginia beyond the people who read AIAW. I thought this was important information to share and to get out as quickly as possible even if my grasp of the details was still sketchy. So, I posted what I knew, both here and at Raising Kaine with the hopes of following up today.
It turns out, I don’t have to. Another Raising Kaine diarist, Dianne, posted a comment where she fleshed out the details, complete with a link to local coverage in today’s Free Lance Star. She reminded Raising Kaine readers, in her title, “Labor supports Democrats, Now let’s support Labor.” She even linked to map information, telling readers, “figure out what you can do to show your support for the UAW.”
I am profoundly grateful to Dianne for picking up the ball for me when I was busy. And I’m also thankful to Lowell for providing the graphic to go with the diary – he always finds just the right graphic for me even while chiding me to pay attention to that stuff myself.
This incident made me think more about the value of the Raising Kaine community.
When they began Raising Kaine, Lowell Feld and Josh Chernila, envisioned something fairly new to the blogosphere, which itself is still a new and evolving medium. They wanted more than a blog. They wanted to revive the whole idea of a public square with active and engaged citizens joining in a dialogue. They wanted Raising Kaine to be an organizing tool and something more than that, a place where progressives could go to try out new ideas, encourage one another and even inspire each other.
They created a site where diarists would put up posts, others would comment, and the community could argue or affirm the opinions, positions and tactics under discussion. And above all, they wanted Raising Kaine to be the place where we could share information about campaigns including ideas, message content, and the nuts and bolts details, such as where the phone banking was taking place and what day and time people would be walking the precincts, knocking on doors and doing lit drops. They wanted to get out the practical information such as where to meet and who was having a fundraiser.
So, Raising Kaine became a true community, sharing ideas, information, and even venting anger. I am privileged to be one of the front pagers there, though I don’t post as often as I’d like.
I keep my own blog, this one, too. But when I have an opinion for which I want wider readership, I’ll go over there because not only will more people see it, but it will also generate more discussion. If I want to throw something out for a broader debate, that’s the place I’ll post it. And finally, if there’s news that is important for me to share with a larger audience than AIAW gets, I’ll put it up as a diary on Raising Kaine, as I did last night with that announcement of the UAW strike.
And if I falter in some way, others there will pick up the ball as Dianne and Lowell did last night and early this morning before I had the chance to. We argue with each other and we support each other, exactly as a community is supposed to.
And that’s why it’s important that Raising Kaine find a way to deal with those who would exploit its unique character by running a poorly sourced and misleading attack ad on a candidate that Raising Kaine actually supports, as Tim Hugo did.
Raising Kaine is a community composed of individual diarists. If Hugo found something written there that he feels helps his campaign at the expense of Rex Simmons, he can use it, but he should give it the proper attribution by naming the specific diarist who posted it. He should not leave his audience with the misleading impression that it was the opinion of Raising Kaine.
And Hugo’s deceptive campaign practices should not force Raising Kaine into changing the way it does business. Being a community has great value. Republicans can see that and want to divide us. Hugo’s ad was not just an attack ad aimed at Rex Simmons. It was an attack on Raising Kaine and its vision of a progressive community.
We can’t let that drive a wedge between us. We can and should differ among ourselves on issues, candidates, any number of things. But when a Republican tries to exploit our uniqueness and turn our greatest strength against us for his own political gain, we need to pull together and show what our community is made of.
The best way to do that is to continue doing exactly what we have been doing. We should close ranks behind those we support who have been unfairly attacked and also call out those who have been deceptive and sought to mislead the public about our real positions. And above all, we should insist on staying a community that lifts each member up so that we can further progressive causes.
Thank you Raising Kaine!
Showing posts with label Tim Hugo. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Tim Hugo. Show all posts
Tuesday, September 25, 2007
Monday, September 24, 2007
Tim Hugo: Lying Liars and the Lies They Tell
CORRECTION: Lowell Feld just sent me an email correcting a mistake in this post. I said that Raising Kaine had endorsed Rex Simmons in the primary, which was an error on my part. Raising Kaine originally endorsed Morris Meyers. They do support Rex Simmons fully in the general election. AIAW.
By now most people who are interested in blogs and campaigns have probably caught Tim Craig’s Washington Post story last Saturday, where Raising Kaine objected to a Tim Hugo campaign ad, which Lowell Feld called deceptive.
Hugo aired an attack ad against his opponent, Rex Simmons, and attributed damaging quotes, disparaging Simmons’ integrity, to Raising Kaine. RK endorsed Simmons in the primary and certainly is supporting him in the general election against Republican candidate Hugo. But the ad makes it appear as though Raising Kaine were critical of Simmons.
Nothing could be further from the truth. One diarist at RK, however, did post a critical diary after a bruising primary where his candidate lost. Nate de la Piedra, of Next Generation Democrats, expressed some personal anger in his ill-considered diary, which he later removed.
The main objection by Feld and others is that Tim Hugo did not properly source the quotes used in the ad. The argument is that the quotes should have been sourced to the diarist not simply to RK. It wasn’t that Hugo lied. It’s that he told a half-truth designed to mislead the public.
In the WaPo story, Hugo admitted he knew who had posted the diary and not just that person’s screen name but his real identity. That’s tantamount to making a deliberate decision to mislead viewers.
This controversy has swirled around the blogosphere all weekend with bloggers on both sides of the spectrum weighing in. The rightwing, of course, was simply gloating that it happened to RK. That’s a shame because it will probably come around to them, as all things that go around do. It will be harder for them to whine when they are treated unfairly if they don’t stand up for ethical sourcing now.
Anyway, one of the more rational and principled disagreements with the left, though, comes from Bwana at Renaissance Ruminations. His main point is that while it was probably something he personally wouldn’t do, the diary was fair game as was the blog RK as a whole. His point seemed to be that it’s going to happen to blogs regardless of how much we object to it, so we might was well either get used to it or figure out how to prevent it by changing what we allow to be posted on our blogs.
Bwana is not wrong. You can rail against reality but it’s gonna be reality anyway. Unscrupulous politicians and their campaign operatives are going to continue making unfair and misleading ads as long as they are effective no matter how much we object.
So, we do have to figure out how to slow them down or not let ourselves be taken advantage of.
One obvious way would be for Raising Kaine to change the way it does business. It could go from being a community of progressives, which encourages ordinary citizens to air their opinions in diaries in a free forum to one that polices what goes up on the site. Lowell has always envisioned RK as a citizen’s public square where people meet to consider a variety of opinions. That makes RK more vulnerable than my blog, for example, or Bwana’s. I am, after all, a one-woman show. I’m the only one responsible for the posts on AIAW.
However, I don’t think Lowell, Josh and the rest of the RK management ought to change the nature of RK. It’s a valuable forum. But they have already taken one very simple step that newspapers and even radio and TV stations use when they air differing opinions. RK will now have a visible disclaimer that the views of individual diarists do not represent the views of the entire RK community. Of course, RK will also continue to get out the word that they endorse Rex Simmons and have done so since the primary.
But here’s another suggested way to handle it. Continue to insist loudly and publicly that Tim Hugo ran a misleading and deceptive ad. Get the word out. Turn it around on him. He claimed we can’t trust Rex Simmons.
Well, guess what?
We just can’t trust Tim Hugo. He’ll say anything to get elected. And he doesn’t care whose opinions he misrepresents and how many people he misleads.
Want to discourage dishonesty? Keep pointing it out. Maybe some people think that what happens to RK is the consequence of having a popular public forum that encourages a freewheeling debate. That may be true. But being publicly called out as a deceptive liar is the consequence of being deceptive and lying.
By now most people who are interested in blogs and campaigns have probably caught Tim Craig’s Washington Post story last Saturday, where Raising Kaine objected to a Tim Hugo campaign ad, which Lowell Feld called deceptive.
Hugo aired an attack ad against his opponent, Rex Simmons, and attributed damaging quotes, disparaging Simmons’ integrity, to Raising Kaine. RK endorsed Simmons in the primary and certainly is supporting him in the general election against Republican candidate Hugo. But the ad makes it appear as though Raising Kaine were critical of Simmons.
Nothing could be further from the truth. One diarist at RK, however, did post a critical diary after a bruising primary where his candidate lost. Nate de la Piedra, of Next Generation Democrats, expressed some personal anger in his ill-considered diary, which he later removed.
The main objection by Feld and others is that Tim Hugo did not properly source the quotes used in the ad. The argument is that the quotes should have been sourced to the diarist not simply to RK. It wasn’t that Hugo lied. It’s that he told a half-truth designed to mislead the public.
In the WaPo story, Hugo admitted he knew who had posted the diary and not just that person’s screen name but his real identity. That’s tantamount to making a deliberate decision to mislead viewers.
This controversy has swirled around the blogosphere all weekend with bloggers on both sides of the spectrum weighing in. The rightwing, of course, was simply gloating that it happened to RK. That’s a shame because it will probably come around to them, as all things that go around do. It will be harder for them to whine when they are treated unfairly if they don’t stand up for ethical sourcing now.
Anyway, one of the more rational and principled disagreements with the left, though, comes from Bwana at Renaissance Ruminations. His main point is that while it was probably something he personally wouldn’t do, the diary was fair game as was the blog RK as a whole. His point seemed to be that it’s going to happen to blogs regardless of how much we object to it, so we might was well either get used to it or figure out how to prevent it by changing what we allow to be posted on our blogs.
Bwana is not wrong. You can rail against reality but it’s gonna be reality anyway. Unscrupulous politicians and their campaign operatives are going to continue making unfair and misleading ads as long as they are effective no matter how much we object.
So, we do have to figure out how to slow them down or not let ourselves be taken advantage of.
One obvious way would be for Raising Kaine to change the way it does business. It could go from being a community of progressives, which encourages ordinary citizens to air their opinions in diaries in a free forum to one that polices what goes up on the site. Lowell has always envisioned RK as a citizen’s public square where people meet to consider a variety of opinions. That makes RK more vulnerable than my blog, for example, or Bwana’s. I am, after all, a one-woman show. I’m the only one responsible for the posts on AIAW.
However, I don’t think Lowell, Josh and the rest of the RK management ought to change the nature of RK. It’s a valuable forum. But they have already taken one very simple step that newspapers and even radio and TV stations use when they air differing opinions. RK will now have a visible disclaimer that the views of individual diarists do not represent the views of the entire RK community. Of course, RK will also continue to get out the word that they endorse Rex Simmons and have done so since the primary.
But here’s another suggested way to handle it. Continue to insist loudly and publicly that Tim Hugo ran a misleading and deceptive ad. Get the word out. Turn it around on him. He claimed we can’t trust Rex Simmons.
Well, guess what?
We just can’t trust Tim Hugo. He’ll say anything to get elected. And he doesn’t care whose opinions he misrepresents and how many people he misleads.
Want to discourage dishonesty? Keep pointing it out. Maybe some people think that what happens to RK is the consequence of having a popular public forum that encourages a freewheeling debate. That may be true. But being publicly called out as a deceptive liar is the consequence of being deceptive and lying.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)